A comparison of HIV health services utilization measures in a marginalized population

Self-report versus medical records

Chinazo O. Cunningham, Xuan Li, Kelly Ramsey, Nancy L. Sohler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In studies examining the use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) health services, researchers often use subject's self-reported measures. Agreement between a subject's self-reports and medical records in marginalized populations is uncertain, yet important to understand, as this population is disproportionately affected by HIV. METHODS: We sought to examine agreement between self-report and medical record health care utilization measures. Using a cross-sectional study, we studied 428 unstably housed HIV-infected adults in New York City. Self-reported data were collected from Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews, and medical record data from health care providers' and facilities' ambulatory medical records. Agreement for a 6-month period was compared for ambulatory visits (0, 1, ≥2), HIV medications (antiretroviral therapy, opportunistic infection prophylaxis), whether CD4 counts and viral loads were performed and their values (CD4: <200, 200-500, >500 cells/mm3; Viral load: undetectable, detected). RESULTS: Agreement between self-report and medical records was 55.2% (kappa = 0.12) for visits, and 68.2-79.1% (kappa = 0.27-0.48) for medications. Agreement on whether laboratory tests were performed was 62.3-65.7% (kappa ≤ 0.11-0.14), whereas agreement on laboratory values was 77.6-79.3% (kappa = 0.52-0.70). Most disagreement resulted in greater number of self-reported visits, use of medications, and laboratory tests compared with medical record data. CONCLUSIONS:: Among HIV-infected marginalized individuals, agreement between self-report and medical records was poor for ambulatory visits, poor to fair for medication use, and poor for laboratory tests performed. However, agreement for CD4 count value was substantially better. These findings have implications on health services research in marginalized populations that relies only on self-report or medical record data. This study underscores the importance of understanding how self-reported and medical record data are correlated in marginalized populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)264-268
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Care
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Self Report
Health Services
Medical Records
health service
utilization
HIV
medication
Population
health care
Values
prophylaxis
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Viral Load
cross-sectional study
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
HIV-2
Health Services Research
Health Facilities
Opportunistic Infections
Health Personnel

Keywords

  • Ambulatory care
  • HIV
  • Laboratory tests
  • Medications
  • Self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

A comparison of HIV health services utilization measures in a marginalized population : Self-report versus medical records. / Cunningham, Chinazo O.; Li, Xuan; Ramsey, Kelly; Sohler, Nancy L.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 45, No. 3, 03.2007, p. 264-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93108ab2b286411ab9f9c590b121cf47,
title = "A comparison of HIV health services utilization measures in a marginalized population: Self-report versus medical records",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In studies examining the use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) health services, researchers often use subject's self-reported measures. Agreement between a subject's self-reports and medical records in marginalized populations is uncertain, yet important to understand, as this population is disproportionately affected by HIV. METHODS: We sought to examine agreement between self-report and medical record health care utilization measures. Using a cross-sectional study, we studied 428 unstably housed HIV-infected adults in New York City. Self-reported data were collected from Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews, and medical record data from health care providers' and facilities' ambulatory medical records. Agreement for a 6-month period was compared for ambulatory visits (0, 1, ≥2), HIV medications (antiretroviral therapy, opportunistic infection prophylaxis), whether CD4 counts and viral loads were performed and their values (CD4: <200, 200-500, >500 cells/mm3; Viral load: undetectable, detected). RESULTS: Agreement between self-report and medical records was 55.2{\%} (kappa = 0.12) for visits, and 68.2-79.1{\%} (kappa = 0.27-0.48) for medications. Agreement on whether laboratory tests were performed was 62.3-65.7{\%} (kappa ≤ 0.11-0.14), whereas agreement on laboratory values was 77.6-79.3{\%} (kappa = 0.52-0.70). Most disagreement resulted in greater number of self-reported visits, use of medications, and laboratory tests compared with medical record data. CONCLUSIONS:: Among HIV-infected marginalized individuals, agreement between self-report and medical records was poor for ambulatory visits, poor to fair for medication use, and poor for laboratory tests performed. However, agreement for CD4 count value was substantially better. These findings have implications on health services research in marginalized populations that relies only on self-report or medical record data. This study underscores the importance of understanding how self-reported and medical record data are correlated in marginalized populations.",
keywords = "Ambulatory care, HIV, Laboratory tests, Medications, Self-report",
author = "Cunningham, {Chinazo O.} and Xuan Li and Kelly Ramsey and Sohler, {Nancy L.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/01.mlr.0000250294.16240.2e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "264--268",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of HIV health services utilization measures in a marginalized population

T2 - Self-report versus medical records

AU - Cunningham, Chinazo O.

AU - Li, Xuan

AU - Ramsey, Kelly

AU - Sohler, Nancy L.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: In studies examining the use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) health services, researchers often use subject's self-reported measures. Agreement between a subject's self-reports and medical records in marginalized populations is uncertain, yet important to understand, as this population is disproportionately affected by HIV. METHODS: We sought to examine agreement between self-report and medical record health care utilization measures. Using a cross-sectional study, we studied 428 unstably housed HIV-infected adults in New York City. Self-reported data were collected from Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews, and medical record data from health care providers' and facilities' ambulatory medical records. Agreement for a 6-month period was compared for ambulatory visits (0, 1, ≥2), HIV medications (antiretroviral therapy, opportunistic infection prophylaxis), whether CD4 counts and viral loads were performed and their values (CD4: <200, 200-500, >500 cells/mm3; Viral load: undetectable, detected). RESULTS: Agreement between self-report and medical records was 55.2% (kappa = 0.12) for visits, and 68.2-79.1% (kappa = 0.27-0.48) for medications. Agreement on whether laboratory tests were performed was 62.3-65.7% (kappa ≤ 0.11-0.14), whereas agreement on laboratory values was 77.6-79.3% (kappa = 0.52-0.70). Most disagreement resulted in greater number of self-reported visits, use of medications, and laboratory tests compared with medical record data. CONCLUSIONS:: Among HIV-infected marginalized individuals, agreement between self-report and medical records was poor for ambulatory visits, poor to fair for medication use, and poor for laboratory tests performed. However, agreement for CD4 count value was substantially better. These findings have implications on health services research in marginalized populations that relies only on self-report or medical record data. This study underscores the importance of understanding how self-reported and medical record data are correlated in marginalized populations.

AB - BACKGROUND: In studies examining the use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) health services, researchers often use subject's self-reported measures. Agreement between a subject's self-reports and medical records in marginalized populations is uncertain, yet important to understand, as this population is disproportionately affected by HIV. METHODS: We sought to examine agreement between self-report and medical record health care utilization measures. Using a cross-sectional study, we studied 428 unstably housed HIV-infected adults in New York City. Self-reported data were collected from Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews, and medical record data from health care providers' and facilities' ambulatory medical records. Agreement for a 6-month period was compared for ambulatory visits (0, 1, ≥2), HIV medications (antiretroviral therapy, opportunistic infection prophylaxis), whether CD4 counts and viral loads were performed and their values (CD4: <200, 200-500, >500 cells/mm3; Viral load: undetectable, detected). RESULTS: Agreement between self-report and medical records was 55.2% (kappa = 0.12) for visits, and 68.2-79.1% (kappa = 0.27-0.48) for medications. Agreement on whether laboratory tests were performed was 62.3-65.7% (kappa ≤ 0.11-0.14), whereas agreement on laboratory values was 77.6-79.3% (kappa = 0.52-0.70). Most disagreement resulted in greater number of self-reported visits, use of medications, and laboratory tests compared with medical record data. CONCLUSIONS:: Among HIV-infected marginalized individuals, agreement between self-report and medical records was poor for ambulatory visits, poor to fair for medication use, and poor for laboratory tests performed. However, agreement for CD4 count value was substantially better. These findings have implications on health services research in marginalized populations that relies only on self-report or medical record data. This study underscores the importance of understanding how self-reported and medical record data are correlated in marginalized populations.

KW - Ambulatory care

KW - HIV

KW - Laboratory tests

KW - Medications

KW - Self-report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847232974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847232974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250294.16240.2e

DO - 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250294.16240.2e

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 264

EP - 268

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 3

ER -