A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection

Julia C. Gage, Arpita Ghosh, Sylvia Borgonovo, Stephen Follansbee, Nicolas Wentzensen, Patti E. Gravitt, Niels Grabe, Bernd Lahrmann, Philip E. Castle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We compared the performance of commonly used Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology. Study Design: From 23 HIV-positive men screened at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco (San Francisco, Calif., USA), 2 anal specimens were collected, 1 with each swab in random order, and placed into liquid cytology medium. Specimens were tested for cellularity by quantifying a genomic DNA (erv-3). The number of cells was assessed from prepared slides by automated image analysis. Performance was compared between swabs using 2-sample t tests and standard crossover trial analysis methods accounting for period effect. Results: Flocked swabs collected slightly more erv-3 cells than Dacron for the first sample although not significantly (p = 0.18) and a similar number of erv-3 cells for the second sample (p = 0.85). Flocked swabs collected slightly more cells per slide than the Dacron swabs at both time periods although this was only significant in the second time period (p = 0.42 and 0.03 for first and second periods, respectively). In crossover trial analysis, flocked swabs outperformed Dacron for cell count per slide based on slide imaging (p = 0.03), but Dacron and flocked swabs performed similarly based on erv-3 quantification (p = 0.14). Conclusions: Further studies should determine whether flocked swabs increase the representation of diagnostically important cells compared to Dacron.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)364-367
Number of pages4
JournalActa Cytologica
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Specimen Handling
Polyethylene Terephthalates
Nylons
Cell Biology
San Francisco
Cross-Over Studies
Cell Count
HIV
DNA

Keywords

  • Anal neoplasia
  • Cytological techniques
  • Cytology
  • Human papillomavirus testing
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

Gage, J. C., Ghosh, A., Borgonovo, S., Follansbee, S., Wentzensen, N., Gravitt, P. E., ... Castle, P. E. (2011). A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection. Acta Cytologica, 55(4), 364-367. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329488

A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection. / Gage, Julia C.; Ghosh, Arpita; Borgonovo, Sylvia; Follansbee, Stephen; Wentzensen, Nicolas; Gravitt, Patti E.; Grabe, Niels; Lahrmann, Bernd; Castle, Philip E.

In: Acta Cytologica, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2011, p. 364-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gage, JC, Ghosh, A, Borgonovo, S, Follansbee, S, Wentzensen, N, Gravitt, PE, Grabe, N, Lahrmann, B & Castle, PE 2011, 'A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection', Acta Cytologica, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 364-367. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329488
Gage JC, Ghosh A, Borgonovo S, Follansbee S, Wentzensen N, Gravitt PE et al. A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection. Acta Cytologica. 2011;55(4):364-367. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329488
Gage, Julia C. ; Ghosh, Arpita ; Borgonovo, Sylvia ; Follansbee, Stephen ; Wentzensen, Nicolas ; Gravitt, Patti E. ; Grabe, Niels ; Lahrmann, Bernd ; Castle, Philip E. / A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection. In: Acta Cytologica. 2011 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 364-367.
@article{3750b3b03b5b4a38b0a5601d3b2ebd23,
title = "A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection",
abstract = "Objectives: We compared the performance of commonly used Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology. Study Design: From 23 HIV-positive men screened at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco (San Francisco, Calif., USA), 2 anal specimens were collected, 1 with each swab in random order, and placed into liquid cytology medium. Specimens were tested for cellularity by quantifying a genomic DNA (erv-3). The number of cells was assessed from prepared slides by automated image analysis. Performance was compared between swabs using 2-sample t tests and standard crossover trial analysis methods accounting for period effect. Results: Flocked swabs collected slightly more erv-3 cells than Dacron for the first sample although not significantly (p = 0.18) and a similar number of erv-3 cells for the second sample (p = 0.85). Flocked swabs collected slightly more cells per slide than the Dacron swabs at both time periods although this was only significant in the second time period (p = 0.42 and 0.03 for first and second periods, respectively). In crossover trial analysis, flocked swabs outperformed Dacron for cell count per slide based on slide imaging (p = 0.03), but Dacron and flocked swabs performed similarly based on erv-3 quantification (p = 0.14). Conclusions: Further studies should determine whether flocked swabs increase the representation of diagnostically important cells compared to Dacron.",
keywords = "Anal neoplasia, Cytological techniques, Cytology, Human papillomavirus testing, Screening",
author = "Gage, {Julia C.} and Arpita Ghosh and Sylvia Borgonovo and Stephen Follansbee and Nicolas Wentzensen and Gravitt, {Patti E.} and Niels Grabe and Bernd Lahrmann and Castle, {Philip E.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1159/000329488",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "364--367",
journal = "Acta Cytologica",
issn = "0001-5547",
publisher = "Science Printers and Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology specimen collection

AU - Gage, Julia C.

AU - Ghosh, Arpita

AU - Borgonovo, Sylvia

AU - Follansbee, Stephen

AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas

AU - Gravitt, Patti E.

AU - Grabe, Niels

AU - Lahrmann, Bernd

AU - Castle, Philip E.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objectives: We compared the performance of commonly used Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology. Study Design: From 23 HIV-positive men screened at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco (San Francisco, Calif., USA), 2 anal specimens were collected, 1 with each swab in random order, and placed into liquid cytology medium. Specimens were tested for cellularity by quantifying a genomic DNA (erv-3). The number of cells was assessed from prepared slides by automated image analysis. Performance was compared between swabs using 2-sample t tests and standard crossover trial analysis methods accounting for period effect. Results: Flocked swabs collected slightly more erv-3 cells than Dacron for the first sample although not significantly (p = 0.18) and a similar number of erv-3 cells for the second sample (p = 0.85). Flocked swabs collected slightly more cells per slide than the Dacron swabs at both time periods although this was only significant in the second time period (p = 0.42 and 0.03 for first and second periods, respectively). In crossover trial analysis, flocked swabs outperformed Dacron for cell count per slide based on slide imaging (p = 0.03), but Dacron and flocked swabs performed similarly based on erv-3 quantification (p = 0.14). Conclusions: Further studies should determine whether flocked swabs increase the representation of diagnostically important cells compared to Dacron.

AB - Objectives: We compared the performance of commonly used Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology. Study Design: From 23 HIV-positive men screened at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco (San Francisco, Calif., USA), 2 anal specimens were collected, 1 with each swab in random order, and placed into liquid cytology medium. Specimens were tested for cellularity by quantifying a genomic DNA (erv-3). The number of cells was assessed from prepared slides by automated image analysis. Performance was compared between swabs using 2-sample t tests and standard crossover trial analysis methods accounting for period effect. Results: Flocked swabs collected slightly more erv-3 cells than Dacron for the first sample although not significantly (p = 0.18) and a similar number of erv-3 cells for the second sample (p = 0.85). Flocked swabs collected slightly more cells per slide than the Dacron swabs at both time periods although this was only significant in the second time period (p = 0.42 and 0.03 for first and second periods, respectively). In crossover trial analysis, flocked swabs outperformed Dacron for cell count per slide based on slide imaging (p = 0.03), but Dacron and flocked swabs performed similarly based on erv-3 quantification (p = 0.14). Conclusions: Further studies should determine whether flocked swabs increase the representation of diagnostically important cells compared to Dacron.

KW - Anal neoplasia

KW - Cytological techniques

KW - Cytology

KW - Human papillomavirus testing

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052881443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052881443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000329488

DO - 10.1159/000329488

M3 - Article

C2 - 21791907

AN - SCOPUS:80052881443

VL - 55

SP - 364

EP - 367

JO - Acta Cytologica

JF - Acta Cytologica

SN - 0001-5547

IS - 4

ER -